One of the most common problems that you’ll encounter in machine learning is multicollinearity. This occurs when two or more predictor variables in a dataset are highly correlated.

When this occurs, a model may be able to fit a training dataset well but it may perform poorly on a new dataset it has never seen because it overfits the training set.

One way to get around this problem is to use a method known as partial least squares, which works as follows:

- Standardize both the predictor and response variables.
- Calculate
*M*linear combinations (called “PLS components”) of the original*p*predictor variables that explain a significant amount of variation in both the response variable and the predictor variables. - Use the method of least squares to fit a linear regression model using the PLS components as predictors.
- Use k-fold cross-validation to find the optimal number of PLS components to keep in the model.

This tutorial provides a step-by-step example of how to perform partial least squares in Python.

**Step 1: Import Necessary Packages**

First, we’ll import the necessary packages to perform partial least squares in Python:

**import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from sklearn.preprocessing import scale
from sklearn import model_selection
from sklearn.model_selection import RepeatedKFold
from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split
from sklearn.cross_decomposition import PLSRegression
from sklearn.metrics import mean_squared_error
**

**Step 2: Load the Data**

For this example, we’ll use a dataset called **mtcars**, which contains information about 33 different cars. We’ll use **hp** as the response variable and the following variables as the predictors:

- mpg
- disp
- drat
- wt
- qsec

The following code shows how to load and view this dataset:

**#define URL where data is located
url = "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Statology/Python-Guides/main/mtcars.csv"
#read in data
data_full = pd.read_csv(url)
#select subset of data
data = data_full[["mpg", "disp", "drat", "wt", "qsec", "hp"]]
#view first six rows of data
data[0:6]
mpg disp drat wt qsec hp
0 21.0 160.0 3.90 2.620 16.46 110
1 21.0 160.0 3.90 2.875 17.02 110
2 22.8 108.0 3.85 2.320 18.61 93
3 21.4 258.0 3.08 3.215 19.44 110
4 18.7 360.0 3.15 3.440 17.02 175
5 18.1 225.0 2.76 3.460 20.22 105**

**Step 3: Fit the Partial Least Squares Model**

The following code shows how to fit the PLS model to this data.

Note that **cv = RepeatedKFold()** tells Python to use k-fold cross-validation to evaluate the performance of the model. For this example we choose k = 10 folds, repeated 3 times.

**#define predictor and response variables
X = data[["mpg", "disp", "drat", "wt", "qsec"]]
y = data[["hp"]]
#define cross-validation method
cv = RepeatedKFold(n_splits=10, n_repeats=3, random_state=1)
mse = []
n = len(X)
# Calculate MSE with only the intercept
score = -1*model_selection.cross_val_score(PLSRegression(n_components=1),
np.ones((n,1)), y, cv=cv, scoring='neg_mean_squared_error').mean()
mse.append(score)
# Calculate MSE using cross-validation, adding one component at a time
for i in np.arange(1, 6):
pls = PLSRegression(n_components=i)
score = -1*model_selection.cross_val_score(pls, scale(X), y, cv=cv,
scoring='neg_mean_squared_error').mean()
mse.append(score)
#plot test MSE vs. number of components
plt.plot(mse)
plt.xlabel('Number of PLS Components')
plt.ylabel('MSE')
plt.title('hp')
**

The plot displays the number of PLS components along the x-axis and the test MSE (mean squared error) along the y-axis.

From the plot we can see that the test MSE decreases by adding in two PLS components, yet it begins to increase as we add more than two PLS components.

Thus, the optimal model includes just the first two PLS components.

**Step 4: Use the Final Model to Make Predictions**

We can use the final PLS model with two PLS components to make predictions on new observations.

The following code shows how to split the original dataset into a training and testing set and use the PLS model with two PLS components to make predictions on the testing set.

**#split the dataset into training (70%) and testing (30%) sets
X_train,X_test,y_train,y_test = train_test_split(X,y,test_size=0.3,random_state=0)
#calculate RMSE
pls = PLSRegression(n_components=2)
pls.fit(scale(X_train), y_train)
np.sqrt(mean_squared_error(y_test, pls.predict(scale(X_test))))
29.9094
**

We can see that the test RMSE turns out to be **29.9094**. This is the average deviation between the predicted value for *hp* and the observed value for *hp* for the observations in the testing set.

The complete Python code use in this example can be found here.